Archive for the ‘ Drama ’ Category

The Penny

This movie was made by an Independent company called Filmweavers. This was the company’s first feature length film and won an award at the San Antonio Christian Film Festival.

This story is about the lives of six people. Throughout the film, we see their lives gradually being twisted together to a climatic finish. Each have their own struggles and trials they are facing, based off of choices they have made in the past. The plot thickens to the finale when they are brought together and discover that Providence knew what He was doing all along…

 

Things I Liked

This being a independent Christian film, there are many applaudable morals presented in the movie. Strong father leadership, caring in the family, the acknowledgement of God, and Evil being presented in a light that is not glorified or shown as something to be desired.

No cussing or swearing whatsoever.

Having seen a lot of “christian” films, this one was very good relatively speaking far as acting and production goes. The plot was tight, actors seemed pretty natural, those it did feel forced at times, and the camera work was decent as well.

 Things I Didn’t Like

There is some violence in this movie. A man is shot, A hostage is handled pretty roughly, and guns are held to the head and pointed at people a lot.

At a party some guys get drunk and shamelessly hit on some girls. One attempts to land a kiss, but the girl smacks him away. So, not fun to watch, but I appreciate the fact they showed drunkenness as something not to be desired. The daughter is extremely rebellious and demonstrates disrespectful actions. She faces consequences eventually, but for a younger audience, this should be noted.

The main thing that got me in this film is the Policeman, out of desparation, breaks laws he is supposed to uphold by entering an apartment without permission. These actions get me the most because it is shown as “justified” sin. He knows it is bad, but to futher the “greater good” he can do a “little” sin? Not biblical.

Closing Thoughts

I went into this movie expecting something of a “Sherwood Pictures” film. Not only did I get that, but I finally saw an action type film that glorified God and had you on the edge of your seat till the credits. The story is deep, the script-writing brilliant (and funny at times), and the production value quite impressive based off of their $20,000 budget.

Only word of caution is for the less mature of kids, I would be careful about letting them watch it. A lot of the action happens at night, and the one guy getting shot is extremely dramatic. Use discernment if choosing this and you have younger kids with you.

This film is a keeper in my book, I hope you will support the makers of this movie and purchase a DVD of this flick. It will be money well spent, and you will never look at a penny the same way.

2013
01/21
CATEGORY
Action
Drama
Unrated
1 comment

Ever After

ever_afterI know, I know, it’s just another Cinderella story, what with the legendary glass slipper, the eligible prince, wicked stepmother, horrible step sisters, and the orphaned girl who spends her time among the soot and ashes of the fireplace longing for true love—but that is where you would be wrong. While Ever After does have all these elements, it also has so much more going for it.

Danielle is the kind-hearted step daughter who, despite her oppressive environment, generally maintains a sweet spirit and desire to please the only mother she has ever known. Her stepmother. But when her stepmother sells off one of the family servants, who has loved Danielle since her infancy, in order to pay the step mother’s debts, Danielle knows she has to do something. So, posing as a baroness, she boldly goes to the castle to purchase back her grandfatherly friend and, while securing his freedom, lands herself in a boatload of trouble!

In enters Henry, the prince of France, who is being forced by his father (with the hopes of grounding his son a bit more and giving him a direction in life) into either choosing his own bride, or be forced into a contractual marriage with Spain. But once Henry sees the lovely Danielle stand up for the life of her friend, he’s intrigued by the spitfire and begins to pursue a young woman who doesn’t want to be pursued, for fear of being exposed as a servant.

Positive Elements

Danielle really is forbearing under the vilest of circumstances. While I have heard it said by some (admittedly by those who have not watched the movie themselves) that Danielle is extremely feministic, I would argue that she has many character traits worth emulating, especially in regards to her family.

Rodmilla (stepmother) is a beast, and openly favors her oldest daughter (while shunning her younger daughter, raising her just barely above her stepchild). Depriving Danielle of any love or pride, she is constantly fault finding and scheming to ruin Danielle’s chances of a happily ever after, due to her jealousy of the girl and the love her father had for her. And yet, through all of this, Danielle continues to serve her stepmother, longing above all else to find love and acceptance in her arms. It is only until the end, when Rodmilla’s feelings are made most clear, that Danielle begins to stand up to her stepmother.

Life lessons abound like dozens of sound bites throughout the film, and it extols things like loyalty, trust, friendship, religious faith, the love between a father and daughter, chivalry, mercy, and one’s obligation to use power and position for the good of mankind.

Negative Elements

Danielle is something of a tomboy, though as she ages she becomes much more comfortable with her femininity. She is a rather forceful young woman when it comes to defending herself and others, and she isn’t sitting around waiting and pining for Prince Charming, which may turn off some people. In fact, when Prince Charming comes, he has some foibles, and Danielle is more than willing to call him on those, challenging his complacency and views on life. For me, this is a positive element, but to others, I know it can be an issue.

The only real issue with the film is its language. There is a scene where the s-word is used strongly, and there are several exclamations where the Lord’s name is used in vain, one of which is very startling as it is shrieked by the wicked and impatient stepsister.

Also, divorce is joked about rather casually by Henry’s parents. Although we see that, in the end, they really do care for one another, and they are willing to work through their issues, they often make quips to each other about their issues.

As for costuming… there are a couple of issues with the neckline of the courtier’s dresses, including Danielle’s (when she’s gussied up). One scene in particular was a bit unnecessary when we have a pan down to look at a brooch on a woman’s bodice. It is brief, but still irked me.

Conclusion

Scenic landscape, very cool costumes, good acting, and a nice twist on the Cinderella story make this an enjoyable film to watch, especially for how little content issue there are, and how counter-cultural Danielle’s attitude towards her aggressive stepmother is. People can say what they like about the film, but my entire family enjoys Ever After, and will continue to do so, I am sure, for years to come. I think it is a movie worth giving a chance (be sure and check out the things you have previously heard when viewing it). If you don’t like it, no harm done, but if you take the chance and watch it, you might find that you actually enjoy the ride.

2013
01/16
CATEGORY
Adventure
Comedy
Drama
Film Review
PG
Romance
1 comment

Kingdom Of Heaven

Kingdom of Heaven Movie Poster

Baliam, a blacksmith, is approached by crusaders (one being his father) to join them in their quest. After first refusing to do so, certain immediate events after that refusal force him to change his mind.

He joins his father, who eventually knights him to take his place, in the few crusaders who were loyal to the king. These men’s focus is peace and honor. Something other knights, led by an evil lord, do not have or wish at all.

Baliam finds himself in the middle of feuding knights, confusing loyalties, and Jerusalem on the brink of a war with the muslims. He must choose and decide for himself, what God’s will truly is and then, stand against the men who are against God.

Things I liked

Baliam, played by Orlando Bloom, has all the qualities one would expect from a good lord and knight. He despises injustice, desires peace, is honest to the point of admitting murder, is humble and asks for forgiveness, and speaks his thoughts in a simple way. He has flaws, like all well developed characters. When a decision came that was extremely utilitarian in its purpose, he choose the one that was biblical, not otherwise. Baliam is a hero in this movie I felt good rooting for. Ultimately he is selfless in his actions and patient in his example. A true model of a good knight and lord.

The king of Jerusalem has an extreme illness that is killing him, and early on in the movie, has has a conversation with Baliam. The quotes regarding faith versus religion, convictions, and God’s will are incredibly artistic and spot on. One time the King says “You see, none of us choose are end really. A king, may move a man. A father, claim a son. But remember even when those who move you be kings or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone. When you stand before God you cannot say but I was told by others to do thus. Or that virtue was not convenient at the time. This will not suffice.” Baliam holds true to this quote throughout the movie.

Another instance Baliam is talking to a priest, as jerusalem is about to be invaded:

Priest: “we must flee the city on horse”

Baliam: “And what about the people?”

Priest: “It is unfortunate but it is God’s will.”

Baliam: “You’ve taught me a lot about religion priest.”

All throughout the movie we see the evil crusaders using “God’s will” as an excuse to serve their selfish desires, and ultimately, like proverbs says, they are themselves destroyed by their evil passions. We also see a clear distinction between faith in God and practicing religion, and how religion is something to be avoided and despised.

Things I didn’t like

The king has a sister, Sybilla, who likes Baliam and Baliam likes her. She is promised to marry the lead antagonist, a rude, arrogant, and generally unlikeable lord who is set to become king. She is against this, and in one scene, we see her come to baliam’s house. They kiss, and she spends the night at his house. Much is implied through that scene. While there is some remorse afterwards, it is more because of they fact they cannot marry, as opposed to the actual sin.

For those of you who don’t know, Ridley Scott directed this movie, and he is known for a violence in films that is not at all appealing. It is bloody, dirty, and at times, horrific. He does this to show the glory in war is not all that it is cracked up to be. How much we are reminded of that in this movie. I cannot begin to tell you how many people die in this movie. There is an epic battle scene near the end of the movie, much like you would see in Lord of the Rings. Blood flows, splashes, and squirts freely.

Perhaps even more disturbing however are the individual killings seen in 2-3 minute clips early on in the movie. In just anger, Baliam slaughters a preist, running a sword through the man and pushing him into the smithy where he burns to death. In a forest ambush, we see a group of a dozen men shot in the chest, neck, and heads with arrows. Some keep fighting however, while looking like bloody pincushions. We see blood flow freely here as well. In the aftermath, we see the corpses, awaiting to be buried.

Other violence includes men being hanged, heads mounted on pikes after a battle, and in one battle, a slow motion sword hack that gets a man in the neck. A peaceful Arab emissary is knifed in the head as a response to war. The evil knights kill innocent civilians…. and more. Never is this violence glorified or approved of. Much like in Lord of the Rings, it is present because evil men wish it to be and are using people to serve their purposes. It is there though, and not at all enjoyable.

Words such as B—–d, H–l (out of context) are used, and God’s name in vain are used a few times.

Closing Thoughts

“What man is a man that does not leave the world a better place?”

This is a question the Baliam asks early on in the movie. Indeed, it seems all his actions revolve around this quote, and wanting to leave the world a better place. Not because he has something to gain, but because it appears, he values his conscience being right with God.

This movie shows, in my opinion, a man who rises above the worldly and petty bickering, stands against (for the most part unless it involves girls) temptation for selfish desires, and uses his title to work in a way that will make peace. Even when everyone else turns against him. Evil, is shown for what it is, and then justly punished… And a pretty solid worldview on what God is, what people make him out to be, and a positive view on faith in God rather than religion is shown. It is a war movie with a commendable hero and a just ending.

So if you can handle the bloody and gruesome violence of war brought by the antagonist, and want a full and satisfying story… Check this one out.

2013
01/10
CATEGORY
Action
Drama
Film Review
R
1 comment

The Dark Knight

dark_knight_movie_PosterThis second part of the Batman Trilogy, as directed by Christopher Nolan, introduces Batman’s arch nemesis.

He comes in without a story, an intro, or a motive, and offers to the mobs, who have been crushed under Batman’s and Jeff Gordon’s rule, that he will kill Batman. All they have to do is chalk up half of all they have.

So desperate to be rid of Gotham’s knight and hero they agree, and so sets in motion the most twisted and vile actions of Gotham’s newest super-villain.

The Joker.

 

Things I liked

The reoccurring theme of the Dark Knight, if it could be summed up in one word, would “Sacrifice”.

Batman, once again, is a light in the darkness of Gotham. He keeps his rule of “no killing”, even when faced with the temptation and perhaps, justification to do so. He is Gotham’s “White Knight”, who takes all guilt upon himself for the good of the city.

Harvy Dent, a statesman who does not succumb to the the threats of the Joker and the Mobsters sacrifices his career for Batman, he chooses to fight crime not to get votes, but because it is right. He is the hero which the public people of Gotham grow to love, and as such, the Joker grows to hate.

Another man familiar with sacrifice is Chief of Police Jeff Gordon. He faces death many times, and is prepared to give his life for ordinary citizens, Harvy Dent, and even Batman. He puts his position at stake by providing the help Batman needs, and stepping back when is necessary.

When we see a man act in a manner which is extremely selfish, and we see him almost lose his life over that action. Anytime a person acts for himself, the consequences are quite bad. Save for the Joker, he didn’t get that memo.

Lucius Fox and Alfred are two men who serve as mentors to Bruce Wayne. They speak some profound wisdom in the movie in dealing with the Joker and acting in a manner which is good for others and not self. The Civilians of Gotham also choose to stand up against the Joker, and don’t participate in his final social experiment.

Things I didn’t like

The reoccurring thing I didn’t like can be summed up into one word. The Joker and his murders.

The violence in The Dark Knight is not of blood, gore, and mass killings. They are mental, the camera looks away, and try as you might not to, makes you imagine what happened behind that closed door. The Joker puts is best.

“Do you want to know why I use a knife? Guns are too quick. You can’t savor all the… little emotions. In… you see, in their last moments, people show you who they really are.”

And he does use the knife. In terrible, mesmerizing, and horrifying ways. He tells stories. Stories of how he got the scars on his face. You are drawn into the 30 second tale of family abuse or a broken marriage. And then… A swift movement and the camera cuts away. Letting your depraved heart fill in all “those little details”.

Many people are shot, some villains, some police officers. We see a men hung, dressed like batman, hanging from the Gotham bridge. Another hostage is “played with” by the Joker on a News Station. The Joker blows up buildings, cars, and more. He sets on fire a pile of money with an accountant strapped to the top. He kills a man with a pencil through the eye. A man is blown up with a bomb implanted in his stomach. We see a man’s face catch on fire, and a full closeup of the damage afterwards in gruesome detail. A young woman is killed with a bomb…. And that is not even all of the examples.

There are about a dozen profanities, God’s name is used in vain, and so is Jesus’ a few times as well.

There are a few low cut dresses shown, as Bruce has to maintain his public image of a reckless and dumb young guy.

Closing Thoughts

I’ll say this now. These thoughts are going to be long and many. The Dark knight is a complex movie of many themes to consider. There are no plot spoilers though.

What is perhaps most disturbing about the Joker isn’t the fact he uses a knife, enjoys killing, or does not recognize a moral compass. What is most disturbing, is he understands man’s natural state of depravity, and he embraces it.

“These people’s morals, their code. It’s like a bad joke. Dropped at the first sign of trouble. They’re only as good as the world allows them to be. I’ll show you, when the chips are down… These… “Civilized” people… They’ll eat each other. See, I’m not a monster, I’m just ahead of the curve.”

We see and read here the Joker understands man is flawed and naturally evil. However, he rejects the hope there is something better, rather, chooses to live without a spiritual mask, and be who he truly is. The result is a man whose methods are so disturbing and evil, it makes you ask “Is that really inside me?”

If the motive of the Joker could be fleshed out, I would say it is making Batman see how society and even himself are living under a self placed spirit of delusion. That they are being “clowns” in their nice little societies, putting their faith in Laws and Rules.

“You have all these rules and you think they’ll save you! The only sensible way to live in this world is without rules.”

Instead, he advocates anarchy, because that is living in reality, not hiding who you really are.

“I just did what I do best. I took your little plan and I turned it on itself. Look what I did to this city with a few drums of gas and a couple of bullets. You know… You know what I’ve noticed? Nobody panics when things go “according to plan.” Even if the plan is horrifying! If, tomorrow, I tell the press that, like, a gang banger will get shot, or a truckload of soldiers will be blown up, nobody panics, because it’s all “part of the plan”. But when I say that one little old mayor will die, well then everyone loses their minds! Introduce a little anarchy. Upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos. I’m an agent of chaos. Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It’s fair!”

This movie without doubt shows there is evil in the hearts of man and in the world. What it fails to do is provide the viewer with equal confidence of there being “good” in the world as well. This actually isn’t surprising though, as Christ is absent from the movie. Without Christ, there is no good in man, and honestly that is what we see in the Joker and in many other characters.

The sole redeemer is Batman, who plays the role of of the literary “Christ Figure”. He sacrifices for those he loves, his name, and his well being to save the people of Gotham. Not from physical destruction, but a societal one. He takes the blame, for which he has done no wrong, in the form of a lie. A lie in which does not serve or protect himself, but ultimately serves and protects others.

The Dark Knight is a mesmerizing, horrifying, and thought provoking film. I cannot think of another movie which demonstrates man’s natural state anymore clearly than this one, and does so in a manner so well done. What is no joke however, is the lack of hope, which I expected to be shown in the Dark Knight Rises. The fact is, the Joker, and his ideals are all but disregarded in the third movie, which leaves the lack of good still in question. Ultimately we know good will conquer evil in the end, and there is Good in this universe, which is the Trinity of God the father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.

This is where The Dark Knight falls so terribly short. Instead of combating such a terrible evil with a greater good, the evil is allowed to win. Maybe not on the script, but it definitely does in our mind. Making us imagine and feel murders, while watching the Joker gleefully go on his merry path of heartless destruction, is enough to turn anyone’s stomach sour. Then the best we see our hero do, the Batman, is take the blame for an action the Joker did? It is heroic, but hardly a victory. In fact, one could argue Batman still lost, because the Joker got his way and killed the Batman, just not physically.

Evil triumphs over good in this movie, which is something I can neither advocate nor recommend. The Joker plays masterfully from his hand, while Batman desperately claws for any card which will give him a hand to play. That hand never comes, because it was the Joker’s game all along. Batman was just the inexperienced opponent to make the game interesting.

2013
01/05
CATEGORY
Action
Crime
Drama
Film Review
PG-13
4 comments

Braveheart

BraveheartFreedom.

That’s something the Scotts don’t have. They are ruled by corrupt Nobles, who act in the interests of self and pay homage to the king of England, Edward Longshanks. In reward, Longshanks gives them land, with the condition they pay taxes on the piece of property. The Nobles profit, and commoners starve, and so the cycle repeats over and over…

Until one day, when a solider tries to take advantage of his wife, William Wallace stands for it no longer. With bloody vengeance and passion he kills every solider in his town, and takes the life of the noble who treated his wife unjustly.

And so William starts down a path to free Scotland from the King’s tyrannical rule. The King reacts by sending an army of immense proportions to quell this rebellion. William and his men are ready to fight for the freedom of Scotland. No matter what the cost.

And it costs them dearly.

Things I Liked

One opening line in the movie, and is referenced over and over, is this:

“I know you can fight, but it is our wits that make us men.”

I appreciated the view shown, that being able to shoot, out-lift, or fight better than others does not make one a man. It is the wits and heart which show true manhood, and in many instances we see scottish men do so. They outsmart the enemy, are fiercely loyal to their cause, die for one another, and comfort each other.

William Wallace embodies several fine traits, he is full of conviction and passion for his cause. Sadly, it is for the wrong reasons, but we can learn and observe it. I was reminded and asked myself “Am I that passionate for Christ?” He is uncompromising in his values, and doesn’t succumb to bribery like the nobles. He makes many sacrifices for what he believes, and leads others in a manner of compassion and consideration. He is a servant leader, putting others before himself.

Things I didn’t Like

I want to warn you, the content below, while I attempt to put it as tastefully as possible, is still revolting. Read with caution, if at all. I summarize everything in the closing thoughts, so if you don’t want nitty gritty… Skip this. I also reveal quite a bit of plot, but nothing which gives away the ending.

This movie was full of sin, filth, and gruesome things. I was actually quite shocked that so many people recommended this with all the junk in here… I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt they forgot the bad stuff due to it being so bad…

First, the sexual content. William loves a girl in his home village, and without her father’s permission, begins to court her. Over the course of time, they get married in secret. The reason for this is the nobles have been given “Right to the bride’s bed”, and any newlywed would be taken by the noble that same night. In addition, the father does not agree to the marriage.

The wedding night, the camera shows full nudity, waist up, of both William and his new wife kissing. The shot lasts for a few seconds… but it was long enough to see what you could wish to unsee. William also has an adulterous affair with a woman for one night. Only kissing is shown there, but much is implied. William does not make honorable choices when it comes to women, which diminishes his character quite a bit.

Before a battle, all the scottish soldiers reveal themselves to the opposing army. We see nothing there, but soon after they decide to moon the English army too. Many shots of the Scottish’s derrières are shown. I lost count of how many comments with innuendo or crude humor were made. There were dozens.

Next, The body count in this movie rivals any movie I have ever seen. An alternate title of this movie could have been “How many different ways can we kill scottish and english soliders?” There is no way I can list them all… Men are battered, stabbed, slit, crushed, pummeled, disemboweled, amputated, beheaded, shot with arrows, thrown out of building, impaled, trampled… To name a few. Blood flows freely from the wounds inflicted from the swords and maces. The camera never looks away until the damage has been shown to the fullest.

One particularly disturbing scene, a woman’s neck is slit by a lord, and the camera watches her die as the blood again, flows freely. Another man is drawn and quartered in torture, then it is implied he is castrated as means of inflicting more pain. Dead corpses get as much screen time as live ones. One shot shows a barn full of men, women, and children who have been hanged. Another shot shows dead men with deep and bloody wounds. The aftermaths of battle show the ground red with blood, dying men cry out, and we see a few “mercy killings”. Another scene is a solider tries to rape a woman. She fights back and gets away before the damage is done, but we see her slapped and kicked. The man doesn’t fare much better though, as he is bitten, clawed, and slapped.

Profanities are many, pretty much all of em really. God’s name is not taken in vain from where I can remember though. There are many crude jokes and humour regarding bodily functions, or lack thereof.

Closing Thoughts

This movie is rated “R” for intense and graphic violence and sexual content. Indeed, this movie had both.

Why would I watch it then? To be honest many friends and adults, whose opinions I hold in high regard, recommended this movie. They said it was full of courage, the willingness to stand up against what was wrong, and full of other heroic virtues. I expected an honorable movie with a hero worthy of merit. To say I was disappointed, would be a horrid understatement.

Braveheart is a movie of conviction. The conviction of William Wallace to never back down, to never compromise on values, and to live a life not afraid of death…. All in the name of freedom. On the worldly surface this looks great, while taking notes during the movie though, I saw the conviction throughout the entire film being misplaced. William’s conviction is not rooted in honoring Christ, but avenging those he loves and to be free from England. He prays to God not because he loves Him, but because he needs something from Him in order to fulfill his quest. That misplaced conviction led me never to fully root for Wallace.

We can take this idea though, and apply it to our Christian faith. We are to live free in Christ, no longer enslaved by sin and the desire to do and partake of evil things. We are to live uncompromising lives, never flinching of backing down from our loyalty to God and Christ. We are know what we believe and why we believe it, then act on those convictions.

The contrast is clear, when man puts his whole into a country and others first, the results are lacking and empty.

We see that in this movie. We know from history the Scotts achieved freedom, but for what purpose? Not to be able to worship God as they saw fit, but to live better lives. When you get down to it, this movie shows a man full of worldly passion for country and self, and willing do anything he believes necessary to achieve it, deceptively shrouded in the guise and word of “Freedom” by the filmakers. Couple these worldly and self serving motives with the unneeded few seconds of waist up nudity, an adulterous affair, the intensely revolting violence, lack of biblical justification, and more…

I have come to the conclusion Braveheart does show a few commendable qualities, but hardly makes an impact in comparison to the filth and depravity shown.

2013
01/01
CATEGORY
Action
Adventure
Drama
Film Review
R
7 comments

Les Misérables

les_miserables_ver3_xlg

“Do you hear the people sing?”

“There lived a man whose name was Jean Valjean. He stole some bread to save his sister’s son. For nineteen winters served his time; in sweat he washed away his crime…” The year is 1815 and, after nineteen tedious years in prison, bitter Valjean is finally released. After he is put on parole by the legalistic policeman Javert, Valjean is driven by despair and hatred. Through a kind bishop’s act of grace and forgiveness, Valjean becomes a changed and redeemed man, but the world is still hard and cruel. Is there hope and love to be found in such miserableness?

The Good

Les Misérables is a story of redemption and of God’s grace. Man is fallen and depraved and goodness comes from God alone. In a world of darkness, hope in Christ is a singular ray of light.

Love is an overarching theme in this story. There is some romantic love, but the majority of the film focuses on a true form of sacrificial love. A mother sacrifices everything for her daughter’s well-being, a man puts everything at stake to clear another man’s name, a girl stops at nothing to protect the man she loves, and a father’s love for his daughter causes him to do what would protect her and make her happy, even though it causes him immense sorrow. This is true love. The kind of love displayed by constantly giving of yourself for another without getting anything out of it in return.

Valjean is a character that exemplifies mercy whereas Inspector Javert is driven by justice. Both men believe to be following God. Valjean declares, “I gave my life to God, I know. I made that bargain long ago.” However, Javert also says, “Mine is the way of the Lord, and those who follow the path of the righteous shall have their reward.” Is Valjean a “fugitive running” who is “fallen from grace” and “fallen from God” as Javert believes him to be? Or is Javert so focused on justice and duty that he completely misses the Gospel message of forgiveness? This film gives the correct answer as both men live out their faith and follow Christ as they believe they should. Ultimately, the right way prevails and the contrast is shown.

The Bad

The MPAA rated this film PG-13 for “suggestive and sexual material, violence, and thematic elements.”

Redemption is only as powerful as what a person is redeemed from and, in Les Misérables, the fallen and sinful state of mankind is shown for what it is; vile, dirty, and loathsome.

During one powerful scene, a woman’s decent into despair is shown after she loses her job. This woman, Fantine, sells her necklace, then her hair, next her teeth, and finally, she sells her body into prostitution. The desperation she is driven to is horrifying. During this scene, it is obvious that she is in the company of prostitutes and crude language is amply present in the lyrics that are sung and the women are immodestly dressed and act in suggestive and inappropriate ways. The camera stays with Fantine, even while she reluctantly sells herself. No nudity is shown, but the actions that are implied are enough to make viewers very uncomfortable.

I have heard many concerns regarding this scene and I cannot begin to tell a person whether or not seeing it would be all right for them. It comes down to individual convictions. Personally, I can say, though, that I’ve seen the play on stage many times. In the stage production, during this scene and the song that the prostitutes sing, everyone in the theater erupts in laughter. In the play, it’s comical. In this film, however, none of it was shown as “okay” or “funny”. It is presented as horrible and ugly and not a single viewer in the room laughed. People cried and that was the correct response.

Another musical number that is concerning would be the song of a perverse innkeeper and his wife. To say that this pair is unscrupulous in conducting their business would be an immense understatement. They are the lowest of the low and conduct themselves accordingly. This involves thieving, prostitution, cheating, corruption, fornication, and squalor. This amount of sin is discomforting to watch.

Violence is another aspect to be wary of when deciding whether or not to see this film. There are a few instances where women slap men. Men fight with fists, swords, cannons and guns and there is a battle between revolutionary students and the soldiers as the soldiers strive to annihilate the rebels as they defend their barricade. Blood is visible and people die; including women and children. There is a suicide where a man falls into a river, and the impact of his fall is shown.

There is some smoking and there is also some profanity. Since almost the entirety of the dialogue of the film is sung, language is minimal. However, there are a few instances of the Lord’s name being taken in vain. The s— word is used along with a– and d—. Alcohol is also consumed in several instances throughout the movie.

The Art

As a life-long fan of the musical, I’d like to comment on how it stays true to the original play and also how it has been altered. First of all, several songs are noticeably absent from the film such as ‘Dog Eats Dog’ and other songs such as ‘Turning’ are severely abridged. Much of the transitional dialogue has either been cut out or changed and I was disappointed that a few of my favorite parts were missing from the film. Songs such as ‘Stars’, ‘Do You Hear the People Sing?’, and ‘On My Own’ were moved, but the change was beneficial and aided in the cohesiveness of the story and helped it to flow more smoothly.

The cinematography style was very raw and different, but the creative approach suited Les Misérables well.

In my opinion, the film is a completely different presentation than the musical. The stage production offers more powerful singing whereas the film focuses less on the quality of the actors’ voices on more on the emotion on their faces. When tears are streaming down Hugh Jackman’s or Eddie Redmayne’s faces while they sing, one hardly notices that their voices are cracking because the emotion is so raw and so real. There is no lip-synching and the actors are singing in real-time. Anne Hathaway’s broken and beautiful rendition of ‘I Dreamed a Dream’ was the best I have ever heard, but Russell Crowe’s performance left a lot to be desired. Even though his voice was adequate, his portrayal of Javert was emotionally lacking when compared to the actors I have seen on stage. Bringing Colm Wilkinson (the original Valjean) to play the Bishop was a wonderful addition and served to bring the legacy of Les Misérables to a complete circle.

Naturally, there are some differences from the musical, but the style stayed true to the original feeling and I was excited by some changes that represented Victor Hugo’s novel better, especially regarding Valjean’s love for Cosette, Marius’s and his grandfather’s relationship, the account of the barricade, and Grantaire’s devotion to Enjolras.

In Conclusion

Maybe it is because I grew up with the story. Maybe it is because I have been listening to the musical since I was six years old. Maybe it is because the book is my absolute favorite. All I can say is that there were some things that were different from what I had expected, but, in my humble and personal opinion, it was perfect. The story of Les Misérables is one that I am deeply connected with and, as a result, it was hard for me to take a step back and look at the film objectively. However, I did my best to represent both the favorable and the questionable content in an accurate way.

Regarding the risque content, I had expected to need to avert my eyes, but, although the content was enough to make me uncomfortable, it never “crossed the line” the way I had expected it to. From my personal experience though, I will add that my sixteen-year-old brother did close his eyes due to the immodest dress of the women in the two scenes that I discussed previously in my review and that was it. According to him, the rest of the film was worth it.

I cannot tell anyone whether or not they should see Les Misérables, because it depends heavily on the individual, but I can say with confidence that I would not take children to see this film. It deals with mature issues and only those with a solid worldview and discretion should expose themselves to that content. If you are a fan of the musical, then I would say that it’s worth seeing, otherwise, I would recommend some serious consideration before heading to the theater.

2012
12/27
CATEGORY
Action
Drama
Film Review
PG-13
Romance
3 comments

The Prestige

Prestige_posterAre you watching closely?

Every magic trick has three acts. The Pledge, where the magician promises to amaze. The Turn, where the magician does something ordinary, and makes it extraordinary. That’s not what makes a magician great though, the power of a magician lies not in his trick, but in his secret. It isn’t enough make something disappear, but you have to bring it back. That is the third act:

The Prestige.

Two men have been pursuing this prestige their entire career. However, one night, a terrible event happens, and these two partners become enemies. They become obsessed with the quest of having the greatest act, the greatest prestige a magician can obtain. And in the 1890s, these feats can be quite… dangerous.

The two men, Robert and Alfred, go back and forth, sabotaging people, tricks, and more… For the goal of defeating the other. This looks to go on forever, until one day, a trick is performed… But is it really a trick in the first place. Is it real ? Has science made real magic possible?

Again I ask…

 

Are you watching closely?

Things I liked

To be blunt, the movie’s setting and tone is a dark one. Not because it is frightening, but because of the plot. Robert and Alfred are dead set on beating the other for the purposes of revenge, ambition, and pride. Man’s natural depravity is shown here, and the consequences of that sin is never something uplifted or shown to be admired.

Cutter, the engineer behind hundreds of tricks is one who stands out as the light of reason in the film. He warns both men what this obsession will do to them. He understands the mind of the performers. “They are magicians. Men who live by dressing up simple and plain truths to shock. To amaze… Their life itself, is a lie.” It is worth mentioning, he is not without guilt though. As scripture says, those who know good and do not do it, to them it is sin. He often assists in their tricks, and raising the stakes, even when he knows it will ultimately destroy them.

One man makes an enormous sacrifice for his daughter.

This movie is set in the late 1800s. Magic is more than just a hobby, it is a career. I enjoyed the historical accuracy of the movie, having done reading on the history of magic. The filmography was artistically done, and the story is masterfully written.

Things I didn’t like

Because of the risky business of tricks in that time period, and the obsession each has to defeat another… There violence of a… realistic nature. Not huge body counts like in war movies, but little things, which raise the stakes all throughout the movie. We see two people drown, two hung, one a suicide. There are corpses shown. A man is shot nearly point blank. Sometimes machinery is manipulated to damage the magicians, or the volunteers. We see broken legs, bloodied fingers, lost fingers, and a few dead birds.

The stage assistants wear clothes which are immodest for the purpose of distracting the audience. One man is unfaithful in his marriage. Kissing is shown.

There is one guy consistently drunk who plays a major part of the movie.

Cursing includes h—, b——, d—, and God’s name is used in vain.

Closing Thoughts

“You’re not afraid to get your hands dirty anymore, are you?”

This is asked of one of the magicians after a particularly horrid act.

After watching this movie, the puzzles to unravel were many. The twist at the end was truly spectacular, and one of the best endings I have seen in a long time. It was odd, not to have a hero to root for, nor have an antagonist to despise. Neither men were worth emotional attachment of concern or glory, and it was done intentionally so.

After taking a while to mull over the movie, I have come to the conclusion, if anything, The Prestige is like a magic trick itandof itself. It looks complicated. It looks stunning. It promises to be amazing, and quite honestly, it is.

But there really is just one simple theme, and is captured in this quote :

“The audience knows the truth: The world is simple. It is miserable all the way through…”

When you pull back the curtain of the complex plot and twisting script…
The Prestige is gone and you find the simple truth. All you are left with is a bloodied trail full of suffering, selfishness, and obsession. Seeing once again, the things man is willing to do out of pride and selfish ambition. Reminding us why it is so important to…

“Let nothing be done out of selfish ambition or vain conceit  but in humility let each esteem others better than himself.” ~Philippians 2:3~

(Note, much of the content of the movie cannot be revealed due to spoiling the plot, I have done my best to include everything which is of note or concern without giving the story away. Be aware though, the content is only partially complete.) 

2012
12/08
CATEGORY
Action
Drama
Film Review
Mystery
PG-13
2 comments

Lincoln

Abraham Lincoln.

The mere mention that name brings thoughts of the Civil War, honesty, and freedom of slaves. Oft forgotten though, is his work of the 13th Amendment, which truly granted slaves freedom. Not the Emancipation Proclamation.

This film tells the story of how Lincoln worked to pass this amendment to our constitution. It shows the reasoning behind it, the politics involved, and the opposition to it. Some democrats in the Union refused to acknowledge black people as equal in the Nation. They fight long and hard to fail the amendment, as they argue the south will never surrender with slavery abolished. The amendment will prolong the war, and worse yet, completely divide the nation past the point of repair.We see a glimpse into how Abe lived his life during this short moment in history. We see his family. We see his cabinet. And most importantly, we see his personality brilliantly captured in a manner which not only compliments his virtues, but recognizes his flaws. He is a man, serving as president, in a divided country. He is Lincoln.

Things I liked

The star of this movie is of course Lincoln, and much of the movie is spent on how he lived in every aspect of life….
- Even thought Lincoln was president of the United states of America, family always came first. In cabinet meetings his son would drop in and Lincoln think nothing of it. His wife, Mary, still grieving over the loss of Willie, puts on the mask of a happy first lady, and supports Lincoln in his decisions. She will challenge him on his thoughts, but when his mind is made, she supports him completely. When the votes were being cast, Lincoln stayed at home with his son and spent the day with him. Over and over we see him placing family priorities above everything else in this movie.

- Lincoln was not as perfect a man as many of the history books make him out to be. He was wily and shrewd and could play politics with the best of them. That was not his usual Modus Operandi however. Often he would reason and talk to someone to achieve the desired goal or viewpoint. But when necessary, he acted in ways which were quite political and manipulative. At times we see him offer jobs of patronage for yes votes. One time he flat out lies the the representative assemble, an action deemed “Impeachable” by one of his advisors. I appreciated they made Lincoln a man who lived life. Not a man larger than life.

- Finally about the portrayal of Lincoln, was his personality and how he lead others. Manipulation was a rarity by him, though he would participate in it. We do see many commendable leadership traits by Lincoln. One such trait is his use of stories to communicate points. His use of appropriate humor to defused tense situations. His grace and teaching spirit. He gave one boy a pardon for laming his horse to avoid battle because “I don’t want to hang a boy for being frightened. What good would it be for him.”His meekness as president. His ability to accomplish goals by doing things himself. All of these traits are ones which are to be commended, and while he was not perfect, should be recognized for his strengths.

In addition to Lincoln and how he related to many aspects of the 13th amendment and family, I enjoyed the given perspective of the Civil War. Often slavery is wrongly portrayed as the main factor and basis for the Civil war, which is simply not True. The Vice President of the Confederate State of America said in the movie “You can’t take away our slaves and expect a complete surrender. You take away that and you destroy our economy. Our way of life. Our power. We won’t even know who we are anymore.” 

We are shown the civil was was not mainly about slavery, but about political power and economic security. I appreciated an accurate focus of the war, not twisted and warped into something it wasn’t.

The last thing I would like to note is the quality of the movie. The videography, the lighting, the costumes, the acting, the score…. All were masterfully done. I would have no issue believing Linclon was just like the man on the screen. His mannerisms, his voice, and action were all perfectly mimicked according to historical records. It was a treat to watch and see all of these artistic fields blended together to create the picture on screen.

Things I didn’t like

The main issue I take with this movie is the profanity. There is a lot of it. Dozens misuses of God’s name are said. D—, B—–, F—, and more are used by old men, soldiers, and some riled up congressmen. Even Lincoln dishes out an S— word for some crude humor.

The movie opens with a battle scene where “the Colored Union Soldiers” are fighting Confederates. It is raining, so water has collected in many places. We see men getting beat to death with rifles, stabbed in the stomach with bayonets, stomped to death and drowned… all in the course of around two minutes. While this is not at all enjoyable to watch. It is good to be reminded no battle is glorious or should be praised, especially in the instance of this war.

We are shown a cart dripping large amounts of blood being wheeled, then multiple amputated arms and legs dumped into a pit behind the hospital.

Near the end of the movie. Lincoln goes to the last battle ground in Virginia, and we are shown the aftermath of war. Dead corpses are shown everywhere in various forms of death. Some were ripped open, guts spilling out onto the muddy ground. Some had bayonets in the back. While others where in piles behind cover, piled on top of each other. With John William’s scoring, and Mr. Lincoln’s reaction, it was enough to make you sick and tear up at the same time.

Closing Thoughts

“You can know True North. When I was a surveyor, I would align my compass to true North, The compass points you true north but does not warn you of obstacles and swamps along the way. So while you can plow through people, ideals, and goals focused on True North, without looking at your surroundings, you can wind up stuck in the swamp….” 

Lincoln says to Thaddeus Stevens about Mr. Stevens unwavering principle on the black right to freedom, vote, and more. Lincoln illustrates how while we can know we are right about something, being obnoxious about it and plowing through people with the idea is not going to get you anywhere. It is also going to get you stuck with your idea and people will not want to listen to you. How does Mr. Stevens respond? Well, you’ll have to watch it to find out. ;)
This quote stuck in my mind, because I was instantly reminded of some Christians. You know of whom I speak. ;) How important it is to remember while we are right in following Christ and God’s word it true, that we not become arrogant in such knowledge. That we remain as gentle as a dove, yet wise as a serpent when we witness with our actions, words, and life. The movie portrayed that concept excellently, and gave me a heart check and application to implement.

“Can we choose to be born? Are we fitted to the times we’re born into? We begin with equality, that’s the origin isn’t it? That’s justice. See we’ve shown that a people can endure awful sacrifice and yet cohere.” 

Another outstanding quote from Lincoln. He asks this to a young man, while sitting in the communication room, about to send a message to Grant. While an answer never is decided, the point is made… Are we in this place and time for a purpose? As Christians, we can answer a resounding “Yes”. This makes an excellent talking point for witnessing or starting conversations about life purpose, and I intend to use it as such.

All in all. This movie is like Lincoln himself. It stands tall and true on biblical principles, history, and showing what the Civil war truly was. However, problems (which Lincoln also had) need to be recognized and not excused. These are the language and quite gruesome scenes.
If we remember anything about Lincoln portrayed in this flick, it should be his indubitable spirit and wisdom in the time into which he was fitted. He saw and felt from his deepest conviction the 13th amendment was the the first step in solve to the nation’s problems about division and slavery. And he did what ever he felt within his power as president to do get that done.

When deciding to see this movie, I’ll close with Lincoln’s advice, as my wisdom in this is lacking. He said when making decisions…. “I have been driven many times upon my knees by the overwhelming conviction that I had nowhere else to go. My own wisdom, and that of all about me, seemed insufficient for the day.” 

2012
11/29
CATEGORY
Drama
Film Review
PG-13
Political
Leave a comment

Last Ounce of Courage

Few people in our society today really know the cost of freedom. Few people ever stop and think about the sacrifices made by our Armed Forces, but for Vietnam POW rescuer Bob Revere, the price of freedom is a daily remembrance as he lives life without his son, Tomas, who left for the war in Iraq and never came home. And not only is it a reality for Bob, but it is also a reality for Kari, Tomas’ pregnant bride, and his son Christian, who is only a few months old when his Father is killed.

Our movie takes off from here, moving ahead to 14 years down the road when Kari and Christian move back in with Bob and his wife Dottie. Bob is no longer a freedom fighter; instead, he is a pharmacist and the Mayor, beloved by many in the town. But Bob still lives with great grief and guilt. All of that is about to change, though, when Christian is called into the Principles office for bringing his father’s bible to school. While it riles Bob, he takes the incident sitting down, but Christian holds his father’s sacrifices too close to stay quiet for long.

One fateful night, as the family sits around the TV watching Fox news, Bill O’Reilly challenges the American people over their complacency towards allowing society to remove Christ from Christmas. Suddenly, Christian turns off the TV. “What did my Dad die for?” Christian demands. The answer is clear. He fought for his family’s freedoms, which leads Christian to ask “Then what are we doing?”

The gauntlet has been cast, and Bob begins to have his fire put back under him. The American people aren’t doing enough, and he is going to ensure that the sacrifice his son made is not in vain! So, as Mayor, he’s going to ensure that their little town sets the example, and becomes Christmas city. It’s a small step, but it’s the first step in a revolution he wants to see take place. It’s time to take back Christmas, but more importantly, it’s time to take back our freedoms. But while Bob may be ready to fight for his freedoms, others are ready to fight to keep him in his place.

Positive Elements

Freedom should never be taken for granted, and that’s something this movie wants to ensure doesn’t happen. The freedom he’s going to start with, is freedom of religion. While this movie could have easily turned into a movie about Christmas, it really wasn’t. Sure, Christmas is a back drop for the entire film, but Bob’s true cause is the freedom Christians have to be able to express their convictions openly and without fear. One of the things I loved that the movie did was it made the point that people of other religions—he mentions Muslims and Jews—should be similarly free to erect symbols of their faith in public places, even on Christmas. That is true freedom.

Multiple characters in this movie, most specifically Bob, are willing to stand up against stiff resistance to fight for their freedoms and rights. What’s more, I love the fact that Bob did his research before beginning this crusade, ensuring he is
soundly grounded in legal and historical validation for his actions.

The message of Freedom is closely tied to the message of faith. Bob’s American flag has a cross affixed to the top of the pole, and his efforts largely revolve around the public placement of symbolic representations of Christ, Christianity and the Christmas story—whether its crosses, Christmas trees with angels hanging on them or party invitations that boast a “Merry Christmas” greeting. In a letter to his wife, we also hear Thomas say, “God’s been watching over me. One hundred eighty one days I’ll be home, Lord willing”, and there is talk of praying for troops who are putting their lives on the line.

Negative Elements

The only sexual content in this movie is a kiss between Thomas and Kari before he leaves for war and a brief kiss between Kari and Greg 14 years later. The foulest word you will hear in the movie is heck, and the only drugs or alcohol content is a beer sign in the background of a bar and our villain smoking a cigar, making this movie very clean. The only element that could be disturbing are the war clips shown in the film. There are explosions and gunfire, but all of it is kept to a PG. One scene shows a flashback to Bob’s time in Vietnam, depicting a POW rescue that went tragically. This event is narrated by Bob to his wife. Most of the men in Bob’s unit were killed, and we see him cradling a soldier suffering from head and neck wounds. The most disturbing element of the movie, though, is also the most powerful, and in my honest opinion should not cause anyone to stay away from this movie. I will not give away the details, as that would be a spoiler, but it is not graphic, just startling.

The Art

While I don’t generally deal with this aspect of movies in my reviews, I felt like I needed to with this film. Last Ounce of Courage is a low budget film, reminiscent of when Facing the Giants first hit theaters. The camera shots are not clever, and the lighting is often off in parts, but for me, that made it better in some ways. Why? Because it gives me hope. Some of my recent movie experiences have left me depressed over the state of the movie industry. We have so many potentially good stories that get ruined by foul content or have an underlying agenda. This movie gave me hope. It reminded me that the little guys are still trying to make a difference and are not compromising their story in order to sell more tickets. This film group had a point to make, and they didn’t let budget stop them.

The story was cheesy in some places and powerful in others. The villain was a bit flat, and some moments felt a bit off, but none of that really distracted from the message. A powerful message that needs telling.

In addition, while doing some searching on the movie, I found out that Campbell’s motivation for writing this story closely mirrored Bob’s. The struggles the Revere family endured were trigged by the heroic men in his own family, men who served in wars and also died in them. Set against the backdrop of American soldiers’ courageous sacrifice to preserve our way of life, Campbell hopes the film will be a catalyst for renewed conversation revolving around the question, “What can I do to make sure their sacrifice is not in vain?”

Conclusion

If you liked Fireproof or Facing the Giants, you will like this movie. If you are a Christian, you should see and support this movie in theaters. If you are an American, regardless of religious beliefs, you should see this movie. Why? Because America needs a renewed sense of the cost of freedom. They need to be reminded of the importance of not taking our religious liberties in America for granted.

“We’re losing freedoms that people died for,” Bob says. “We’re asleep. Wake up! We can’t sleep anymore.” I totally agree, as I have seen in my own personal life people discount the sacrifices made for us to be free. Sacrifices which my Great Grandfather and Grandfather fought in wars for, and which my Father served for. We are complacent, and we live in a time where it is easy to object to war and patriotism, especially for those who have no concept of the sacrifices and have never been subjected to the great men that serve in the Armed Forces. Wake up America, and wake up Christians. For if you do not, they will have died in vain, and you will no longer be free.

2012
09/16
CATEGORY
Drama
PG
Leave a comment

Second Chance

Ethan Jenkins and Jake Sanders share a passion for ministry to God’s people. And that’s about all they share.

Ethan is the privileged, crowd drawing son of Pastor Jeremiah Jenkins, a world-renowned church planter. He is the heir and right hand man expected to succeed his aging father at The Rock- white washed megachurch.

Jake, however, hasn’t been privileged with anything in his life, having lived in The Hood before being saved from his old life and becoming a brash street-wise pastor of Second Chance Community Church, right smack in the heart of a beleaguered inner-city neighborhood.

Ethan works with the rich and the influential. Jake ministers to the poor, helping them get off the streets, off the drugs, and out of prostitution, teaching them the value of employment. Real employment.

Second Chance is the sister church to the urban and hip Rock church, and the congregation is generous in their financial support, but Jake is sick of their money and resents their unwillingness to “cross the tracks”, ministering through relational investment. He believes the main reason The Rock writes big checks is so that its members won’t have to get their hands dirty, essentially cleansing their consciences with cash.

Thus, when Ethan begins to challenge the status quo at The Rock, the church board decides he “needs his wings clipped” and sends him to spend a couple weeks with Jake as a form of discipline. And that’s exactly how Ethan sees it. Discipline. Which only fuels Jake’s views of The Rock. Thus two radically, and racially- different worlds collide, and sparks fly. Not the good kind, either.

Positive Elements

This is hard core ministry, guys. And these are real struggles within the American church. We have so many missionaries going across the waters and ministering in other countries, but few wants to deal with this type of ministry. Which is understandable. It’s dirty, it’s heartbreaking, and often there are as few conversions here as there are in other countries, but it is worth it. I know from personal experience.

Second Chance hits strongly on the issues of racism, economic injustice, and social class barriers within the church. Over and over again, the movie insists that getting involved with real people in desperate situations is what matters most, and, to be honest, I think it’s a message the church needs to hear.

Jake wrestles with seeds of bitterness much of the time, yet he remains wholeheartedly committed to his people. He helps men get out of the hood, gamblers, alcoholics, drug users, stands up against predatory drug dealers, takes sandwiches to the hungry and bonds with fatherless teen boys on weekend camping trips. Jake ministers in ways that are time consuming and all encompassing, but he does it because he believes that God has called him to it, and God can save them. In addition, Jake’s lovely wife ministers alongside him, taking in female prostitutes and helping them get on their feet, turn away from their pimps, and get out of their destructive lifestyles. When asked why she holds out hope for these women, and how she does this every day, she responds that she too was one of those young women, before God rescued her. Together, this husband and wife team minister because they believe God loves these people.

I love the fact that this movie deals with the subject of money. Jake reiterates multiple times that money is not what these people need. We see the theme come up over and over again, but we see that the movie doesn’t slant things too far one way. Sometimes the money is needed, but it’s not the answer, and it’s not always a good thing. We also see Jake chastise The Rock’s board of deacons for being more interested in money and power than the welfare of his congregation. He rails against one member, saying, “You know what makes me crazy about the Bible? It says I’ve got to love you. And right now, all I want to do is beat the h— out of you.” (He doesn’t follow through with his frustrated impulse.)

As Ethan witnesses how most of the Second Chance members struggle to meet their most basic needs, it affects his attitude toward materialism. He begins to become uncomfortable with the amount of money his fiancée wants to spend on china- which confuses her because Ethan’s value’s are changing- he trades in his BMW for a simpler car. Throughout the film, we see Ethan changing as he witnesses a side of ministry he’s never seen before. A grittier, dirtier side. Eventually, Ethan makes a tremendous gesture when he washes the feet of the still sullen Jake, bringing a tear to the hard black man’s eye.

Something I love about this movie, though, is the fact that the movie never belittles or blames God. It makes it very clear that His followers are flawed individuals, but it never makes God out to be cheap or be the bad guy.

Negative Elements

My biggest issue, and it’s not really an issue for me, mind you, is that the movie is a bit harsh towards megachurches. At The Rock’s board meeting you hear things like “sell Second Chance’s property to the city to make way for a new baseball stadium”, the board members arguing that the money they’ll receive for the property will help the church’s overseas missions and enable them to build a bigger, better sanctuary for Second Chance (albeit no longer in the heart of the inner city). While I can’t say this doesn’t happen in mega churches (never been to one), I felt like only portraying that was unfair. However, the movie was trying to make a point, and it is not outside the realm of possibility for these types of conversations to occur.

Now, what might bother viewers? Sexual content involves prostitutes, one specifically, who turns for a time to Second Chance after she has been propositioned by men in a car (who make a really crude, euphemistic comment). This girl does not stick around for long, though, and eventually we see her drive off with her pimp to get an abortion and continue in her trade, a crying Mrs. Sanders begging her not to do this.

There is also gang and drug violence in the movie. Jake has a couple of scuffles with drug dealers peddling around the church, and in his first run in deals some “tough love” by putting one of the thugs in a head lock and telling him to quite harassing the young men at Second Chance (something which Ethan questions, feeling like Jake should be more gentle- a concept they don’t agree on). In the second altercation, Jake ends up with a gun to his head and gets hit in the stomach a couple of times. The most violent scene, however, is when a young man stands up for another young man trying to get out of a gang and is beaten and left for dead. An ambulance is called, and the young man survives, but the movie is clear about the gang lifestyle. You leave, and they either kill you, or leave you near dead to suffer before you die. This young man shows up later limping and wearing a gauze head bandage.

The language in this movie will also be offensive to some viewers. To be honest, I hate language in movies. I think it is unnecessary. But I like it in this film. While I understand that comment seems odd, I want to explain my reasoning’s. Most of the language (and there isn’t a ton of it) comes from the mouth of Jake Sanders himself. That’s right; our brash preacher man is the one who uses the foul language the most. But here is why: Jake comes from the hood. Profanity is not only accepted, it’s expected. So obviously removing those words from his vocabulary has been difficult for Jake. So, under pressure or irritation, Jake lets one slip. Somewhere along the lines he makes a reference about having a problem with profanity. And his wife knows it. In fact, we see her cut him off one time, and jab her elbow into him a second time to keep him from saying what he was going to say. Good woman he’s got there. Eventually the line is made “when are you going to stop using that type writer and get a computer?” and Jake’s wife replies back to him, unblinking “when you get control of your mouth”. The struggle of profanity was so powerful, and the movie never condoned it. That is why it is the exception to my language rule. Another interesting line is spoken on the subject of profanity when Tony (good old boy you gotta love!) confronts a young man about uttering an expletive, telling him, “God doesn’t like it when you swear.” Later, Tony asks his friend’s forgiveness for judging him too harshly: “I was more worried about you saying ‘h—’ than how you felt.” For the record, he says this to the young man who took the beating for his friend.

As for drug and alcohol, it’s there, but it’s never condoned and it’s never gratuitous. The film makers are making it clear it’s a part of this environment, and it’s an inner city reality, but that’s about it. Jake leads a recovery group for men trying to break the power of substance abuse, and it’s implied that a drug addict spends money Ethan has given him to go on a drug binge, but all of this is shown as negative.

The only other thing worth mentioning is the fact that, despite watching Jake chastise a Second Chancer for buying a lottery ticket, Ethan later buys another ticket for the man in an attempt to connect with him, an offer which this man, after a brief hesitation, rejects.

Conclusion

Second Chance doesn’t sugar coat anything, and that’s why I like it. I am personally frustrated with the churches’ stance on ministry to “people like this”, so it was a refreshing change to see someone grab the proverbial bull by the horns and deal with this issue. The movie stirs the pot, and honestly, it’s about time that pot was stirred.

A lot of times we brush hard topics like these under the rug, or we ignore them because they make us uncomfortable, but Second Chance is unapologetic as it shows us the realities of social, economic and racial disparities within the body of Christ, in all their grittiness – totally unvarnished.

For the reasons stated above, many Christians won’t want to watch this film- or at least will not want their kids to- but its message is right on the money. It deals with one of my favorite topics. Meeting people where they are at (going to the inner city and working among them, not expecting them to come to you) without “meeting people where they are at” (you do not need to go looking like a homie, people, all you’ll do is make them go “another wanna be gangster”).

It is essential for those who love Christ to roll up their sleeves and get involved. This looks different for everyone, and the movie doesn’t say money is worthless and your financial aid is meaningless, but it does challenge the thought of “that’s all I need to do”. We all have different roles to play in the church body. Not everyone is called to minister to a cutter, someone with suicidal tendencies, or go to the inner city, but we aren’t all called to sit at home, either.

2012
08/30
CATEGORY
Drama
Film Review
PG-13
2 comments
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers